History of Debt
The idea of
being sent to prison for owing someone quite a small amount of money seems hard
to believe today, but it was still happening well into Victorian times. Life in
Victorian prisons was very difficult from the moment of capture to the moment
of death or release, making them a sympathetic lot in many aspects of Victorian
Society.
The position
of debtors in prison was slightly different to that of the regular prison
population. The idea of the debtors being in prison was to confine them, not to
punish them. Consequently, they were housed separately from the rest of the
prison inmates; and the way that they lived in prison was dependant on their
affluence and the generosity of friends and family.
They paid an
admission fee to a certain room and the more expensive the room, the better the
conditions.
There were
no strict rules as there were in the rest of the prison, and the debtors were
free to buy food from a miniature market. Life could actually be very relaxed.
The theory being that men in there would be able to work in order to pay off
their debts. However, in reality, this was often impossible.
In the 17th
century, bankruptcy was a complex legal issue, and few people actually ended up
in the debtor’s prisons, as illustrated by Charles Dickens. Until 1841, the
legal status of being a bankrupt was confined to traders owing more than £100.
Debtors who were not traders did not qualify to become bankrupt, but remained
“insolvent debtors”; responsible for their debts, but unable to pay them. They
remained subject to common law proceedings and indefinite imprisonment, if
their creditors so wished. The legal definition of a trader came to mean all
those who made a living by buying and selling, which in due course also
embraced skilled craftsmen who worked on various materials. However, farmers
were specifically excluded. It was better to be a bankrupt, than an “insolvent
debtor” and as a result, debtors would give misleading general descriptions of
their occupations.
Until the
1700’s, imprisonment was the common punishment in England for debt; but it
became recognized that this was self defeating and, in 1705, a statute was
passed allowing debtors to be released from liability, provided that they
cooperated with the authorities in trying to pay their creditors.
In 1844, an
Act was introduced which defined the position of those who were allowed into
the debtors’ rooms, in order to make sure that those in there were actually
debtors in the true sense of the word; and in 1868, a further Act meant that a
person could only be admitted as a debtor if they had the means to pay off a
creditor, but refused to do so. They were often treated as being in contempt of
court, and treated like a felon.
In Roman
times, and in medieval Europe, debtors were liable to have their property
seized and handed over to creditors. Merchants and traders were often treated
differently to other debtors.
In 1847, new
instructions that were sent to all prisons in Britain meant that people owing
small sums of money would get better treatment, and in the future they would
not have to share cells with serious debtors or criminals.
The official
entry stated “they shall as far as the construction of the prison allow
thereof, be separated from other debtors, but shall not be placed in separate
confinement, or with any class of criminal prisoners”.
In fact, it
was the beginning of a more considerate attitude to debtors, which would
eventually result in the ending of prison for owing money.
Strangely
today, there is a possibility that a debtor can be committed to prison from the
result of litigation, but only for contempt of court, by ignoring a particular
court order.
Many clients
that we act for would love to see us return to the days of debtors’ prisons,
and having witnessed the various predicaments they find themselves in as a
result of being owed substantial sums; it is easy to understand their wishes.
But the laws that protect debtors by allowing them to ignore their financial
obligations are often the laws that allow them to take advantage of their
creditors and will continue to do so for some time in the future; and even ease
the financial pain of debtors further.
“Good
judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment”
And
hopefully remembering this will help you to avoid giving unnecessary and
frivolous credit to someone who could end up owing you a substantial amount of
money, with no hope of repaying the debt
No comments:
Post a Comment